Date of publication: 2017-09-01 17:39
Ah, but won't we have spared some of those folks fiery plane crashes? Likely not many, especially now with heightened security, hardened cockpit doors, more reactive passengers, and the likelihood that future terrorists will hit us where we're not looking. National Safety Council data reveal that in the last half of the 6995s Americans were, mile for mile, 87 times more likely to die in a vehicle crash than on a commercial flight. 6 When I fly to New York, the most dangerous part of my journey is the drive to the Grand Rapids airport. (My highway risk may be muted by my not drinking and driving, but I'm still vulnerable to others who do.)
Accordingly, when you play the hacker game, you learn to keep score primarily by what other hackers think of your skill (this is why you aren't really a hacker until other hackers consistently call you one). This fact is obscured by the image of hacking as solitary work also by a hacker-cultural taboo (gradually decaying since the late 6995s but still potent) against admitting that ego or external validation are involved in one's motivation at all.
There is a community, a shared culture, of expert programmers and networking wizards that traces its history back through decades to the first time-sharing minicomputers and the earliest ARPAnet experiments. The members of this culture originated the term ‘hacker’. Hackers built the Internet. Hackers made the Unix operating system what it is today. Hackers make the World Wide Web work. If you are part of this culture, if you have contributed to it and other people in it know who you are and call you a hacker, you're a hacker.
Since first publishing this page, I've gotten several requests a week (often several a day) from people to "teach me all about hacking". Unfortunately, I don't have the time or energy to do this my own hacking projects, and working as an open-source advocate, take up 665% of my time.
Geoengineering is dicey because earth systems are complex and poorly understood, and interventions have unforseen consequences. To me, this is a clear and urgent call for much better tools for understanding complex systems and forseeing consequences.
I really like your juxtaposition between the two quotes, and the clarification of what the original meaning was. The main difference is that the original admonition is to base one 8767 s views on personal experience and practical results. It is not enough, in other words, to think things through logically, one must test those theories in practice, and see which ones produce a happy life. Buddha was advocating a personalized scientific approach, based on empirical observation rather than deductive inference.
Not true that, 8776 because it “agrees with reason” would seem to be rejected, because “logical conjecture” and “inference” have been rejected 8776 According to our dictionaries, inference is 8775 a conclusion reached on the basis of evidence and reasoning. 8776 You may want to rewrite and rethink that since there is some serious disagreement with reason and rational logic there.
Example: In Where I Lived, and What I Lived For, Thoreau states directly his purpose for going into the woods: I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived.
Many home appliances that consume significant electricity — air conditioner, water heater, clothes dryer, electric vehicle charger — have some tolerance in when they actually need to run. You don’t care exactly when your electric car is charging as long as it’s charged in the morning, and you don’t care exactly when your water heater is heating, as long as the tank stays hot.
Develop an analytical ear for music. Learn to appreciate peculiar kinds of music. Learn to play some musical instrument well, or how to sing.
Example: In Where I Lived, and What I Lived For, Thoreau states directly his purpose for going into the woods when he says that I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived.
I used to recommend against installing either Linux or BSD as a solo project if you're a newbie. Nowadays the installers have gotten good enough that doing it entirely on your own is possible, even for a newbie. Nevertheless, I still recommend making contact with your local Linux user's group and asking for help. It can't hurt, and may smooth the process.
Example: In Where I Lived, and What I Lived For, Thoreau states directly his purpose for going into the woods when he says, I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived.
The real question is — why are readers and decision-makers forced to “believe” anything at all? Many claims made during the debate offered no numbers to back them up. Claims with numbers rarely provided context to interpret those numbers. And never — never! — were readers shown the calculations behind any numbers. Readers had to make up their minds on the basis of hand-waving, rhetoric, bombast.